Our merchant marine ...

Google This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on Hbrary shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project to make the world's books discoverable online. It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that's often difficult to discover. Marks, notations and other maiginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book's long journey from the publisher to a library and finally to you. Usage guidelines Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing this resource, we liave taken steps to prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying. We also ask that you: + Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for personal, non-commercial purposes. + Refrain fivm automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google's system: If you are conducting research on machine translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the use of public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help. + Maintain attributionTht GoogXt "watermark" you see on each file is essential for informing people about this project and helping them find additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it. + Keep it legal Whatever your use, remember that you are responsible for ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just because we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States, that the work is also in the public domain for users in other countries. Whether a book is still in copyright varies from country to country, and we can't offer guidance on whether any specific use of any specific book is allowed. Please do not assume that a book's appearance in Google Book Search means it can be used in any manner anywhere in the world. Copyright infringement liabili^ can be quite severe. About Google Book Search Google's mission is to organize the world's information and to make it universally accessible and useful. Google Book Search helps readers discover the world's books while helping authors and publishers reach new audiences. You can search through the full text of this book on the web at |http : //books . google . com/| ' ^ J ' , r: y ■ J. . ^ . f -. _Z_.- - * GENERAL LIBRARY OF University of Michigan Presented by [I] ^ :T! \^\^:=^^\V« ,»oo ^ '^fsji^-' n''n=^'7^n=>r^'p-'r^rsr^'T^j=L'^.'S.'^'^jc'rs'^n=>r='r^!^rf^ ^-^rp^t^r^ ';=ir^r5:.'E'rp>rsJc^)i « ■ ■ -I v. . ' '^\ \ ^ -''\-. hi S' \ '^ ,'•;. • ^ ?> ^. :X ' r- V /, -•-/: ■- . r~ ^ I -■(. ^ / / /' ■■ :• '/'/ ITS CONDITION AS 8B0WN BY THE ADMIHSTMTION AND TU£ ADMIML OF THE NAVY *1888* I880BDBTTHB AMERICAN SHIPPING AND INDUSTHIAL LEAGUE, FOREIGN CARRYING TRADE. FBOH THB BEPOBT OF HON. C. 8. FAIBCHILD HBCBBTA.SY OF THB TBBABUBY. The following table eIiowb the values of the importa and eiporta of the United States car- ried reapectiTely in American veasels and in forei^ vessels daring each fiscal year, from 1856 to 1887, inclusive, with the percent^ car- ried in Amerioan vessels. 4 Thus it will be seen that onr foreign com- merce, carried in vessels of the United States, measured by its value, has steadily declined from 15 per cent, in 1856 to less than 14 per cent, in 1887. Even of this small percentage (ess than one-half was carried in steam vessels bearing our fla/^. THE MYAL &ESERYE. FBOM THB BBPOBT OP HON. W. C. WHITNBT| SECBETABT OF THE NA.VT. The policy of this country has always been opposed to the establishment of large perma- nent naval and military organizations. This policy, for a country with a great coast line and important commercial interests, almost necessi- tates the maintenance of auxiliaries in the way of naval and military reserves. The land forces have such auxiliaries in the shape of State militia or national guards. These constitute large bodies of troops, well organized and equipped, thoroughly well trained and disci- pi inea, ready to take the field and to become a part of a regular military estabishment when required. A public feeling seems to exist for the crea- tion of a naval reserve. Committees of the Chambers of Commerce of New York and San Francisco have passed resolutions urging the organization of such a force as a means for providing tor the coast defence and meeting the increased demands of ihe regular naval establishment for men and vessels upon the outbreak of war. Inquiries have also been made at the Department from cities of the Great Lakes, and meetings have been held in cities of the South indorsing the formation of such a naiioua] organization. The Department has informed itself fnlly of the different systems of organization for coast defence and naval reserves at present in force 6 in foreign countrieB, and is prepared to formn- late a general plan for a similar organization to meet the requirements and conditions of our own institutions. It should resemble in organi- sation that of the militia or national guard, rest upon the foundation of local interest, contem- plate the employment and rapid mobilization of steamers enrolled on an auxiliary navy list, and be calculated to produce the best results upon a comparatively small national expenditure. I ask for this question the earnest consideration of Congress.^ * It may not be out of place as a branch of this subject to call attention to one of the incidental consequences of the policy pursued by other countries in this matter of a naval reserve. In time of war troop ships or transports are in great demand. Several European Governments make an annual contribution, based on tonnage, to companies constructing new vessels. The consideration to the Government is a counter agreement, permitting the Government to take such a vessel for a transport in time of war upon terms named in the agreement. The Government officials are also consulted as to her mode of construction, and she goes on to the naval reserve list. These payments are inci- dentally in the nature of a subsidy to the ship owner and this, with the liberal payments for Government transportation of mails, etc., keeps a large fleet of merchantmer^ afloat as a reserve ready for a time of war. Without ships and trained seamen there can be no naval reserve. A notable illustration of the generosity and courage with which England pudies her ship- ping interest is seen in the manner in which she IS at this moment dealing with the trade of the Korth Pacific. It has been thus far principally under the American fla^ and contributory to San Francisco and the United States. The British Government and Canada together are proposing for the establishment of a line of first-class sxeamers from Vancouver to Japan. The subsidy is likely to be $300,000 annually — £46,000 from England and £15,000 from Canada. There will also be contributed from the naval reserve fund probably $5 per ton annually for each ship con- structed for the route, which will increase the sum by probably $125,000. ' Under such com- petition it is quite easy to conjecture what will become of the American flag and our resources in the way of ^ naval reserve in the North Pacifia OCR MERCHANT MARINE. FROM THE REPORT OF ADMIRAL B. D, PORTER, UNITED STATES NAVY. I. At present there is a great desire in this coun- try to share with others in the foreign trade, and it is strongly urged that the Government should give its aid in resurrecting our ocean commercial marine, since it is very evident that our shipping cannot be revived without the same assistance that was given the ocean steam lines of Great Britain, France, Italy, Germany and latterly, Spain. Heretofore, when it has been proposed in Congress to grant Government aid to assist in putting afloat hues of ocean steamers, questions of free trade and tariff have been in- troduced to kill the measure, and foreigners who do not wish any competition with their lucrative business, and have plenty of money with which to operate, are always ready to show how much more advantageous it is to Americans that they should have the carrying trade. For- eigners generally argue that they receive no "subsidies," but who knows but themselves what assistance they receive from their Govern- ments? They carry the United States mails at a low figure to keep American vessels from being built to carry them. It costs them little or nothing to carry the mails and they can well spare the small amount of room required. That lines of i&merican steamers should carry the mails is doubtless the desire of every American, and the feeling on this subject is increasing all over the country. At the same time every merchant knows that a line of American ocean steamships cannot be maintained without subsidies from the Government. In regard to this a misappre* hension prevails among the uninformed, who consider it a proposition for the Government to " foster monopolies." Now, there is a great difference between grant- ing a subsidy and fostering a monopoly. In the latter case, the sole power and permission to deal with a certain place or in a certain article is granted, while the case of a subsidy is simply an assistance to an enterprise from which a return is expected, and such subsidies as I have advo- cated should not be confined to any particular line of steamers, but should be given to all ship- owners who are willing to make their ships con* form, in a prescribed degree, to the requirements of a vessel of war, said ships to be constructed under the supervision of the Secretary of the Navy. This is what other commercial nations do, and it is only justice to the Navy and the coun- try that we should pursue a course that will double or treble the number of our cruisers in time of war. One way of granting a subsidy would be to enact the ^^tonnage bill" several times brought before Congress. This bill pro- vides that 30 cents per ton shall be allowed every vessel propelled by sail or steam and built and owned in the United States and trad- ing with foreign countries, for every thousand miles sailed or steamed, the contract to hold good for a term of years, with such restrictions regarding the vessels as the Government shall impose. 10 This would be the simplest plan f or resarrect- ing: the mercantile marine and the Qovemment would have at its disposal a class of vessels lit- tle inferior to the regular cruising ships of war. In fact, the chances are the steam merchant vessels would be superior in speed, which should be the chief desideratum with commerce de- stroyers. By a proper subsidy, such as I have indicated, many industries would be assisted, thoae of 'iron a^d steel, coal mining, shipyarde; canvas, boat-building, hardware, glass-making, pottery, furniture, painters, engine-builders; in short, a hundred differ^^nt branches of trade which combine to make a complete vessel, in- dustries that are now languishing for want of this very stimulus which they would enjoy but for the lack of forethought in those who should labor to advance every employment in which our citizens are engaged. It is not so much the building proper of American steamships that makes them cost more than vessels constructed abroad, as it is the expense of fitting them out; for there is not sufficient competition in this country to bring that kind of work down to the standard of foreign countries where labor is so much cheaper. Ships built in Great Britain cost ten per cent, less; but, when the better finish of American ships and the superiority of our iron is considered, the statements that it would be better for us to build ships on the Clyde or Mersey are seen to be fallacious. With all these facts staring our legislators in the face, they should not hesitate a moment between the proposition to abolish the shipping laws so that vessels could be built abroad for as by British mechanics, and that to foster the 11 indnstries of our own ooantry and have our own ocean steamers constructed in the United States under the supervision of naval officers, so that the Government would have vessels of suitable character to perform the service required of them as commerce destroyers in time of war. This argument doubtless conflicts with the theories of the free-traders of Great Britain and the United States, who require that England shall do all our carrying trade and reap the profits; but, leaving sentimentality out of the question, we will get better ships built in our own country, although the first cost may be rather more, and we shall have the satisfaction of knowing that the vessels can, if necessary, be used for naval purposes. This is what advo- cates for increasing our naval resources aim at in supporting the subsidy measure, for we see how little disposition there has been in this country to build up a navy adequate to its wants and dignity^ but the officers of the navy hope to see some plan adopted without delay, by which, in the event of war, they can afford the necessary protection to our own commerce and inflict damage on that of the enemy. There is a growing feeling in the country with regard to the neglect which has been manifested in building up our ocean mercantUe marine, and it is to be hoped that this feeling will spread until the thousands of unemployed workmen have a chance to earn good wages and the American ocean steamers have a fair share of the $150,000,000 annually paid to foreigners for carrying our goods. By the course we have pursued in this coun- try we have actually given protection to foreign steamships at the expense of our own. The 12 wharvea of New York are decorated with foreign flags, while hardly an American ensign can be seen floating above a steamer suitable for conversion into a vessel of war. This id free trade with a vengeance, all on one side and for the benefit of other nations. We ship oar foods in foreign bottoms and foreigners get the on's share of the profits. No American steam- ships are employed in foreign trade, because subsidized ships can drive them off and carry freight cheaper. It may be denied that these foreign lines are subsidized, but we know they started on a sub- sidy, which their Government wisely allowed them, and with that aid and the opposition our ship owners met with in this country, owing to a want of liberality on the part of Congress, European steam lines can increase and multiply without opposition from the United States. It does not appear to have occurred to our people how this liberality of foreign nations will react against us some day. These lines of foreign steamships have all the ocean traffic in their hands. They have a perfect right to it, no doubt, as long as they find no one to dispute it. New York, to all appearances, is a foreign port, and owes much of her prosperity to the great ships which steam in and out of the harbor almost as often as the trains run up and down the elevated railroad. Many of these ocean steamers are grand struc- tures of great speed and strength, and well cal- culated for commerce destroyers. They could outstrip any cruisers we now have afloat, what- ever we may do in the future. Here is a great fleet of steamships built with all the skill of British artisans that could in ten days' time be « • •• • - ,* 18 metamorphosed into vessels of war, armed with heavy guns, ready to blockade our ports and sweep what commerce we have left from the sea, or to encounter our ships in battle. In the ordinary course of events this is not likely to happen, for the interests of Great Britain and the United States are too closely interwoven to make a conflict of arms between them probable, bat war has occurred before and may occur again, and I wish particularly to draw attention to a naval power right in our midst, built up and fostered by this country and ready to be used against us. The protection that has been given these foreign lines consists in the repudia- tion by our legislators of the claims of our own ship owners and failing to grant them assistance to enable them to compete with other nations I append the names of a few of these great British ships to show what an auxiliary Navy might at this moment have been ours had we taken time by the forelock and devoted our at- tention to the building up of our own mercantile marine instead of that of foreigners. The list here given includes only a portion of the vessels that can be converted into ships of war, but the fleet would be a powerful one if we could con- trol it. Name of Ship. 1 Tons. Name of Ship. Tons. Anrania ,. 7269 4050 5004 4489 8144 4970 4898 4670 458S 7392 7718 82S8 Arizona 6147 BollYia Britieh Qneen City of Richmond City of Chicago Celtic Denmark 8668 Britannic 46S3 City of Montreal 6903 City of Kome 8867 I>eToiiia , 8724 England Btraria 7718 HefyetiaV. /.'.*.*.*/.* '.'.'...'.'.. FnmesBia. 6496 Holland Atate of Nebraska Wisconsin 8848 Servia Umbria 8980 8700 Wyoming li These facts may be deemed snggestirey and when i mention that the Etruria, one of the above named ships, lately made 406 knots in twenty-four consecative nours, or over twenty knots an hour, the importance of building simi- lar vessels for our mercantile marine may be estimated. No matter how great a fleet of war vessels a nation may possess, a strong commer- cial marine is a great addition to it, a matter nrhich is perfectly understood in Europe* Whenever we have been engaged in war our mercantile marine has very greatly contributed to our success. The vessels I have mentioned in the foregoing list form but a small portion of the fleet of clippers which seem at present to have the exclusive right to transport American merchandise across the ocean, and the fact that not a single line of American steamers is em- ployed in transporting material to Europe, is a serious reflection on the enterprise of our citi- zens and an evidence of neglect on the part of Congress. IL As people begin to examine more closely into the subject, the cry of "monopoly" has less weight. Shipping leagues are springing up in all parts of the United States, and the potent arguments advanced at their meetings are sweeping away the clouds of prejudice and showmg the public the true state of affairs. The word "subsidy," so long a bugbear to our legislators, has begun to lose some of its terrors, and they see in the term "subvention" (a Government aid oi bounty) or "postal appropn- 15 ation" no signs of monopoly in England, while at present we are practically insuring a monop- oly in this country to foreign steamship lines. There is no doubt that the new yiew of this matter which is taking possession of the Ameri- can mind has brightened the prospects of our mercantile marine, and it is to be hoped that the many gloomy years in which our commerce has been at a low ebb may be succeeded by a penod of wise legislation in which only a national feeling will prevail. I look for this as hopefully as I do for generous appropriations for the Navy when Congress again assembles. A closer examination of this subject than has heretofore been given it by the majority of our statesmen will show the Joss this country has sustained by a failure of Oon]^ess to act in the premises. In the last eight years no less than one billion two hundred millions of dollars have been paid to foreign steamships, a sum almost equal to our national debt, and a burden that is only made tolerable owing to the immense re- sources of our country. We should be still further depleted but for the fact that we are sustained by the tariff on foreign merchandise and the protection of our manufactures, which prevents us from being undersold by foreigners and enables us to give employment to our Work- ing people, so that with all our drawbacks we grow rich* It would.be hardly fair to accuse the Ameri- can people of a want of energy for failing to revive their ocean commerce when they are ex« hibiting so much of this quality in other direc- tions in developing the resources of the country. It seems to be a law of nature that decadence shall overtake every nation in the course of 16 time, but there is do instance on record of a nation giving up her position in the race for supremacy without a struggle to retrieve her- self. The decadence which has afflicted our ocean carrying trade is not for want of energy on the part of our people, or for the want of laws, but perhaps from a plethora of both which has hampered those who would have labored for its revival. This country was not formed by Government, but was built up by the independent efforts of a sjries of individuals who have led the way in all great enterprises, and in the early days of the Republic never thought of asking Govern- ment aid; but during the great crisis in our history, when all the men and money of the country had to be employed to save it fror^ destruction, the nations of Europe, while ^e were hampered with difficulties at Ibiome, got so far ahead of us in the race for commercial su- premacy that they have ever since maintained ihe lead. The tendency in this country has not been to foster and encourage enterprise, but to limit and destroy it by laws specious enough in read- ing, but which are like the ashes of Dead Sea fruit when placed to the lips. To this system of legislating down hill and closing the door tightly year after vear against the applications of those who stand ready to enter into the busi- ness of reviving the commercial marine, is due the fact that our ocean carrying trade has passed into European hands, and that we are likely to be left with half a dozen machine shops to help us build a navy in times of war, or repair the small one on which, in ordinary times, we seem doomed to rely. 17 While our present illiberal policy is pursued we stand no chance of ever becoming anything more than a fifth-rate power upon the ocean. If we go on at the present rate our country wiU lose much of the strength which it owes to the cohesion of its individual atoms, and, like a soul- less machine working on at random^ it will meeV the fate of many other nations that have flour- ished for a time and then fallen by their own weight. Laying aside all arguments in favor of a mer- cantile marine, it is nfcessary for the assistance of the navy in time of wan We need addi- tional and enlarged markets for our surplus pro- ducts, but foreign vessels with their subsidies are fast elosing all the channels of trade against us, and our manufacturers, who would other- wise help to supply the world, are shut off by British rivals. British steamships have taken^ possession of all the routes of trade, fostered by the British Government and protected by British guns. This is creditable to the British Govern- ment, which looks out for the interests of Eng- lishmen all the world over, and it would seem as if the parent stock of the English-speaking race had more energy than their transatlantic offspring, for their steam mercantile marine not only monopolizes the foreign trade of the United States, but encircles the earth, for there is not a port in the world where there is a chance of nnding a market for manufactured articles that a British steamship does not penetrate. All that is left to us in the way of foreign commerce are the gleanings in the by-ways of trade, about which our great rivals give them- selves little concern, and a few second-rate ves- sels may now and then be encountered trying to 18 make a living under our flag, straggling along like the crows at Pensacola, which haye to go to sea to ^et something to eat. That kind of com- merce IS of little benefit to a nation. It is neces- sary to move on the great thoroughfares of the ocean to have an extensive trade, and Great Brit- ain, in recognition of this f act^ pays her steam lines liberal subsidies. As the great highways of ocean trade are not frequented by American steamships, inquiry 3ught to be made as to why this is the case and remedies adopted to cure the evil, especially as regards those routes where exports from the United States should naturally be carried in our own vessels, but in 1880, when this country had had ample opportunity to revive her Qonmier- cial marine, we find the Americans transported goods to the value of $280,000,000, while for- eign vessels, mostly steamships, carried $1,309,- 166,596, the percentage being in 1856, 75, and in 1880, 17 per cent. This was a treniendous change for a country, and in regard to which a well known statistician observes: ''At the be- ginning of the nineteenth century the commerce of the world seemed to be passing into Ameri- can hands, American shipping having increased fivefold in twenty years;" yet this once flourish- ing state of affairs seems to be forgotten by our legislators, which is the more remarkable con- sidering the highly intelligent character of our members of Congress generally. !tt was natural to suppose that when this fall- ing off of our commercial marine took place Congress would take advantage of the authority given by the Constitution to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and build it up again. The words of the Constitution are ample war- 19 rant to provide that onr ships should receive a fair share of the ocean carrying trade^ and there is just as much power to regulate our ocean commerce as to regulate commerce between the several States of the Union; but to prevent complications with foreign powers and to avoid laying imposts on foreign vessels that w^uld conflict with treaties, we must give our citizens sufficient subsidies to enable them to build and run lines of steamships equal to any afloat. What would ten millions a year be to this country if given by Congress to help build up our commercial marine? It would more than return the equivalent in the shape of customs dues. It would more than pay if we could re- tain in the United States twenty out of the one hundred and fifty millions which are yearly carried out of the country for freights without benefits to our citizens. Why should not Am- erican commerce be allowed the same opportuni- ties that are afforded the other industries of the country, which have reached a development such as the most far-seeing never dreamed of? We are not tied down by foreign subsidized competitors on land, and therefore our progress has been marvelous, and so it would be upon the ocean if the bonds were once cut which con- fine our ship-builders. We will take, for instance, the French mer- chant steamships of over 8,000 tons, which of late years have become a feature in transatlan- tic travel. These vessels were encouraged by their Government as a set-off to the British steamships, which it was seen could be turned into vessels of war at short notice in case of hostilities with France, just as on the late occa- sion the Russians, when threatened with a war 20 with England, fitted up several large steamert in this country as commerce destroyers. France pays to these steamers $14,000 for every round trip between Havre and New York, What chance could an American line have against such a competition as that, receiving no assist- ance from Government and probably not being paid to carry the mails, wnich the foreigners would carry for nothing rather than an Ameri can ship should receive aid from the Govern ment? Even giving us '^free ships and tree materials" would not surmount the difficulty. Foreigners know this, and do not object tc our having fast ships built on the Mersey and the Clyde, as they are aware that we could not run them with any profit, handicapped as we would be by the many advantages possessed by the steamers of Europe. Foreign Governments must have hues of fast ships as offsets to each other in time of war, and are willing to pay for them, but even with Governmental aid the pro- fits of these vessels are not excessive, about six per cent, being the usual limit. Without the subsidy there would be no profit. If there be any lines which do not receive Gk>yemment aid, it IS because they received it until they were able to get along without further assistance. At one time the Cunard Line, with its magnificent fieet, netted 26 per cent. If this line should, for any cause, fail to pay a fair dividend, it will be for the interest of Great Britain to subsidiz it again. After all, the amount required to subsidize a line of steamers is not so very great. Suppose the United States started to subsidize forty ocean steamers the size of those that cross the Atlantic. Putting the Yessels at 8,000 tons 21 each, and allowing 30 cents per ton for ever^ 1^000 milos traveled, the expense would be $2,400 per 1,000 miles for the 8,000 miles, or $7,200 for the voyage, return trip the same, or $14,400 for the round trip. Assuming eight round trips % year would give $115,200 annually for eaol>* steamer, or for the whole forty vessels $4,608,000 for a grand fleet of ships worthy of this Be> publio, any two of which would be worth more m time of war than all the cruisers we have at present m the Navy. Yet $4,500,000 is no great amount for a nation to pay that has so many millions locked up in her Treasury doing no good, while every legiti- mate opportunity should be taken to enlarge the avenues of trade by land and sea in order that our country may fulfill the grand destiny marked out for it. Besides my interest as a citizen in the advance* ment of the country, I am specially concerned in behalf of the Navy, and am endeavoring to show for*how small a sum an auxiliary naval force can be maintained. We spend more than the amount I have mentioned in public build- ings, and treble the sum in river and harbor im- provements, and I would inquire which of these three appropriations would be of the greatest benefit to the country, to say nothing of the more important part we would play in foreign countries? In time of war this great adjunct to our Navy would commit havoc on the enemy's conmierce all over the world, while the heavy ships were defending our coasts. This is a grand picture to contemplate, but I fear a delu- sive one. Judging from the past, we are not equal to the occasion. 22 m. Notwithstanding our former experience, we seem to have learned nothing, and, as regards oar commercial marine, are actually in a worse condition than we were in 1812. Speaking Interestedly, I look at the loss to the Navy through the lack of energetic action on the part of our people and of unwise legislation on the part of Congress. I refer to the want of means to properly man a great fleet in time of war, which, under present circumstances, would be impossible, no matter how many naval ships we might build. A navy cannot be improvised or built at short notice, a fact which all history demonstrates, but it requires some strong in- centive to build it up, such as a powerful enemy ■lear at hand, a commerce to protect, or injuries to avenge, and those nations that have dom- inated the world for so many years have attained their naval greatness only through a long course of training and learning how to turn to account every possible factor in the event of war. A.f ter a long series of hostilities between Great Britain and France, the conviction was forced upon the latter nation that the only way to compete with her rival was to build a navy of equal force. When this scheme was proposed in the French Assembly Mirabeau remarked: '^The English war marine has grown to what it is, like the English oaks, of which the ships ure built, through the slow progress of a thou- Band years. You cannot have a navy without sailors, and sailors are made through the dan- gers of the deep, from father to son, until their QOme is on the wave. You cannot build up a lavy at once by a simple act of legislation." 23 These memorable words are as true to-day as they were when uttered. We must not expect to go on from year to year neglecting everything that tends to in- crease the naval strength of our country and then by some spasm of legislation create at once a navy or mercantile marine. In the case of a mercantile marine there will have to be over- come the opposing elements that have stood for years in the way of a great industry^ and the first step should therefore be to appropriate money liberally, for money is the Archimedean lever that moves the world. No meagre aid should be doled out to repair the mischief cre- ated by unwise economy m the past, but such assistance should be given as will infuse life into every part of the Republic and give em- ployment to hundreds of thousands who to-day are without encouragement to ply their trades, a body of mechanics of whom the country may be proud, and upon whom the Government must rely in time of war. It is the interest of a commercial nation to have as great a balance of trade in its favor as possible. Great Britain, with this idea in view, IS constantly increasing her tonnage, and en- deavors to have all her imports and exports carried in her own vessels, thus realizing nearly the entire selling price of her exports in foreign markets, and for her imports pays only the selling price in those same markets. If we had our own vessels, with which to carry on our trade, most of the freight charges would be retained or returned to this country, whereas $150,000,000 are annually retained or returned to England. With many people this is a mere matter of ^'sentiment.'' They do not care how 1 24 It is done bo that they get their goods to a market, utterly ignoring the question of patriot- ism which should ever animate the hearts of Americans. But even in the breast of the most callous there must occasionally be a feeling of regret at the thought of our flag disappearing from the ocean, like a meteor that flashed for a moment over the surface of the waters and then disappeared forever. But yet there is hope. We are still the young giant among nations, whose muscles are tem- porarily relaxed, and the time may yet come when the American mind, grasping the situation of affairs, will exert its powers to place upon the ocean a fleet of steamers that will be the pride of the nation, and will inaugurate a new era more striking than any previous event in our commercial history. Many persons who cannot be moved by argu- ment or touched by an appeal to their patriotic sensibilities can be convinced by an array of statistics which will show the country is suffer- ing, and how we are handicapped by foreign nations. Not only our traditional commercial rival. Great Britain, but the other nations of Europe have taken the lead of us on the ocean. It is no longer said, " All the foreign commerce of the world is passing into American hands," but *^ All American ocean commerce is passing into the hands of foreigners." These are facts easily substantiated. In the first place, I propose to show that the great ocean steam marine of Great Britain owes its existence solely to subsidies, although many efforts have been made to prove the contrary. Parliamentary papers prove that the system is more than a century old, which showrs that 2b British statesmen were wiser in days of old than we are at present, notwithstanding the example we have had before us. Great Britain started with the idea of building up her industries on a basis that would eclipse all other countries, and her ocean marine was so essential a part of British greatness that from the first it received the most particular attention. The following taken from the reports of the " American Ship- ping and Industrial League," will show how much British commerce owes to subsidies (see 2 2d British Report of Commission of Revenue Inquiry), viz: The attention of the commissioaers of ** fees and gratuities," in the year 1788, was drawn to the expendi- ture, which had been increased in the packet service during several years preceding their inquiry, an ex* penditure, according to their expression, '* so enormous fts almost to surpass credibility,'' the sum of $5,300,000, giving an annual expenditure (in a period of seventeeo years) the sum of $305,000. Here is official British investigation and evidence of shipping subsidy by England, viz.: 1770 to 1788 |5,aOO.OW This continned until next examination by committee of finance, 1797, which ehowd that mstead of being stopped it was increased, averaging np to IdlO 1392,200 yearly, or in all. 1788 to 1810 8,028,900 rhe committee (1810) also mcreaaed the subsidy to |585,000 per year, and continued Increasing until 1816, making a total of 4,7^^00u After which it fell of for three years, 1817 to 1820, to 1,666,000 The spirit of subsidy again arose from 1821 to 1880, andpaid 6.856,000 Making !]i the first sixty years a payment of $25,068,000 It was at this time (1880) that the British commissioner of revenue made an especial investigation " for the pur- pose of inquiring into collection and management of public revenue," and then began the heavy subsidizing of steamships to over $500,000 per annum, as follows, viz.: 26 1880tol887 ., f6,0UO,U0lk From general poetofflce, 18S7 to 1849 ; 35,000.000 From meroanole msrioe fund, 1828 to 1848 87,600,000 Prom general poet-office: 1850 to 1869 (oyer) 60,000,000 1860 to 1869 60,000,000 1870 to 1885 70,000,000 Total assistance from British treasury to her shipping. $278,663,000 This does not include " amounts especially authorized'^ by Parliament from time to lime, or added from " mer- cantile marine fund," or amounts made up by the Brit ish system of '* averaging and adjusting the accounts of her mail steamship companies," in order to enable them to declare an annual diridend of at least eight per cent. In order to anticipate the plea that such was the case, but that England does not now subsidize, the following 18 taken from official publications: 28 Detailed statement from '*fiaancial account" showf £774,626, or $3,870,000. By reference to Secretary Evarts' letter (Com. Rel., 1879, p. 26) the detailed " table of trade of West Indies" shows that only one half of Great Britian's trade is with h ^r own possessions, hence one-half of her subsidy can h - credited to the benefit of her colonies. * • « This settles the subsidy or subvention matter, or whatever name we may choose to call it, and should close the door against the schemes of foreign agents who are plotting to keep lines of American steamships from showing themselves on the ocean so that we may confine our ship- ping to the small vessels that creep along our coast One would think that any American with proper pride of country would burn with indignation at the idea of our playing such an insignificant part — a game in which we may get the shell while our rivals secure the oyster. Consider for a moment the result of our sub- mitting^ so long to this iron rule which affects every industry in the United States. IV. The namber of steam vessels in the world is ffiven in the following table, which is taken Trom the Repertore General of the Bureau Veritas published during the present year, and includes all steamers of whatever class above 100 tons burden: 2<J Flag. British French German.. American Spanish Dutch Italian Russian Norwegian Swedish Austrian Danish Belgian... ..... Japanese Qreek Brazilian Egyptian Portuguese Chilian Mexican Num- Qross ber. Tons. 4,906 6,545,645 -m 745,660 tm 601,976 879 506,668 856 899.577 167 210,549 158 £04,058 SIS 165,447 275 147,011 829 187,»?7 105 185,145 174 127,880 62 111,746 101 92,479 57 54,614 82 49,216 28 82,674 27 26,515 28 24,925 12 18,456 Flag. Num- ber. Argentine...... Chinese Turkish Hawaiian PeiuTian Haytien Zanzibar Uruguay Roumanian .... Tunisian Honduras Persian Venezuelan Costa Rican.... Siamese Ecuador San Domingo.. 22 9 17 12 5 4 2 4 8 2 1 1 8 2 2 1 1 Total.... 8,547 Qross Tons. i8,iva 11,832 11,770 10,127 5,951 4,087 2.828 2,896 2,125 1,762 838 888 71^ 547 829^ 167 10,408^958> This statement shows at a glance the sorry figure which our country cut in the enrollment^ and it must be remembered that of the 379- steamers with which the United States are credited (which includes tugs, river boats and oldy obsolete craft of all sorts), but 101 are actually fitted to navigate the open ocean, and only 15 can be properly classed as ocean-sailing steamers. This last class are those running from New York to Aspinwall and Brazil, and from Ban Francisco to Panama, Australia, and China and Japan. All the others are coastwise vessels, I give below a list of American steamers which make up the 101 vessels referred to above. In compiling it I have rejected all vessels built previous to 1865, all wooden and paddle steam' ers and all below 1,000 tons. CltrotBlodeJk .. Bl Dorado :: iiiinoii.v.'.v,'.!; ., city of N«w York., . dtjofPeklng "Sfa,'*'!:::::: . . EicelatOT " ohto....'.'.'.'",!;;"; S,10l Total, 17 steamera, 6j,013 tone. Other □ lions have 484 steamers of over 3,000 tons. ■nwuN S.I100 Aim 8,000 tohb. Total, 56 Btearoersj ISS^ISS tons. Other na- tioD8 have 1 tons. 9 steamers of from 2,000 to 8,000 ■WBSK IjKO UTD S,000 TONS. Tota), 28 Bteamers, 41,41fi tons. Other nations have over 3,600 steamers of from 1,000 to 3,000 tons. EECAPmn.ATION. n om S.O00 tans n bstwHin «,000 mi 9,000 tona . n between IfiOO uid l^OOO tona. This is a very poor exhibit of Amerioan sea- ffoiog steamers. It shows very few above 8,000 tons, and not all of these are employed. A line of steamships was started from Philadelphia to Europe, consisting of the Illinois, Indiana, Ohio and Fennsylvania, each of 8,100 tons, but it was soon found that they oonld not compete with foreign ; lines for canses already stated. Theo they were purchased by the Pennsylvania 32 Railroad Company and started out again on a quixotic career. The same result followed, and the company had to withdraw and lay them up — Si long row of hulks now, looking very much like those of the Navy laid up in ''Kotten Row.'^ Their short existence indicated that the national spirit ¥ hich influenced a portion of our citizens met with no corresponding feeling iv other quarters, and these vessels became the victims of that temerity which now and then animate citizens anxious to redeem our commerce and place the flag once more upon the sea. The above tables show what an increase there has been in foreign tonnage, owing to the sys- tem of subsidies. In addition to this, in 1860, ships built of iron were gaining in popular favor abroad, an idea that was encouraged in England because ships could be built of a ma terial of which England had an abundance, whereas her supply of timber was limited. Id the mean time, the United States, with plenty of timber, but building no iron ships, began to feel the effects of the new mode of construction in Great Britian, and in consequence were com« pelled to accept low rates oi freight, and, at length, to sell their shipsi so that in 1865 we had but one- third of our foreign commerce, while that of Great Britian had largely in* creased. The iron ships were encouraged by the British Government, for it was seen what a preponderance in tonnage would soon be given their mercantile marine, while the Imted States did nothing to encourage shipbuilding, except forbidding registers to foreign-built ves- sels, and no plant existed in the country for turning out such ships as were being multiplied 33 in Great Britian. It would seem as if our countrymen were so bewildered by the number and size of the steamers constructed abroad, and so delighted at the luxurious accommoda- tion afforded European travelers at so reasona- ble a rate, that they became converts to the English idea, forgetting that the advent of these steamers was a death-blow to the hope of reviving our ocean steam marine. Since that time the decline of our vessels has continued, and at present the tonnage of this country engaged in foreign trade is less than it was in 1810, and if no remedy is applied, it will ere long disappear from the ocean. The advo- cates of free ships contend that the existing state of affairs is largely owing to our navigation laws, and that the only remedy is to authorize the building of our vessels on the Clyde and Mersey; but I think it safe to say that the re- peal of our navigation laws would result in the destruction of our coastwise carrying trade, and that the art of shipbuilding would be one of the lost arts as far as we are concerned. The best argument against this plan is that the nation which has so nearly succeeded in driving us from the ocean is a strong advocate for free ships. Our present facilities for building iron and steel ships are poor enough, as is shown by the fact that none of the builders could contract at once for the ships lately authorized by Congress and agree to finish them in a stated time, while in England such contracts would be accepted in a week, and the ships would be in commission in eighteen months. From this circumstance arises the desire of many people to have our ships built abroad instead of devoting their energies to in- creasing the facilities at homci wbep ike same 84 results vonld follow here as hot obtain in Great' BritaiD. Bat snppose ve coald pnrobaee a ship in Bug- land for $600,000 that would cost 1700,000 ui this country. Would it be any profit to the United States that the pnrchaaer gained llOO,- 000 while the nation lost (600,000 spent in for- eign labor and material? Would it not be bet- ter to retEun the money at home and oiroalate it among our mechanics and laborers? la euch matters we might well take a leaf from Eng- land's book. She spares no effort to keep her laboring people employed in building up her great commercial marine and invincible navy. I remember when American merchants were the moat prominent men all along the Facifio coast of this continent, and our flag, waving at the peak of our splendid ships, outnumbered all others four to one, Americans held nearly all the trade, and then it was foreigners cried oat that it was all passing into oar hands. Bnt to- day how great the differei American merchants to sp handed over all their right a the British merchants, to « the numerous steamships 1 among which none from o found. England has captar are now, like the little fish wake of the shark, gaining from the monster's leavings. BAST INDIA T It has been the ambition meroial nadons for centoriee S6 with the East Indies. The nation that could do it would dominate the commercial world. In the palmy days of our commerce, when our great clipper ships made such quick passages from China and India to England and the United States, there seemed a fair prospect of the bulk of the trade falling into American hands, but the building of great ocean steam- ships and the granting of generous subsidies by the British Government put a stop to all this. America, with the best of iron and the best of mechanical skill, could not compete with her rival. Trip-hammers do not grow spontaneously, and a plant such as was established in England can only be provided by great capitalists backed by the aid of Government. Driven from the ocean, we tried what could be done on land, and by Government assistance built the railroads to the Pacific, part of the straight and short road to India, China and Ja- pan. The project then was to subsidize a line of steamers from San Francisco to China and Japan, and the great trade with those countries would be ours; the time from New York to Hong-Kong would be thirty-four days, whereas by the old route around the cape of Good Hope eighty-six days were required, with all the vicis- situdes of weather and climate. We subsidized a line of steamers, which was eminently success- ful as long as the subsidy lasted, but at length the British put steamships on this route, which curtailed the American profits very materially, and the stoppage of the subsidy to the Pacific Mail Steamship Company reduced its line to an ordinary affair, and our promised wealth flowed into British coffers. Thus the hopes of American trade with Japan 36 particularly, turned out delusive, and the matter stands about as follows: FOBEIGK COMMEBCB OF JAPAN. Country. Imports. Exports. • Total. Great Britain $15378,000 1,538.000 $8,061000 10.854.000 $18,002,000 United States 12,887,000 France 8,128,000 '7.048.000 1 10,176.00C So with the short, straight route to Japan, we lost the race, and when the Pacific Mail Steamship Company's line runs down for want of subsidies, all the carrying trade will pass into British hands. The imports of China and Hong-Kong, to- gether with all other Asiatic countries, amount- ed, in 1879, to 1754,669,000, of which amount Great Britian had $281,631,000, France, $22,893,- 000, and the United States, $1 7,510,000. The ex- ports were $772,766,000; to Great Britian, $225,- 806,000, and to the United States, $53,838,000, showing that in the China trade the Americans fared no better than in the trade with Japan, not- withstanding our straight line to the Indies, all of which is because the English have a system which enables them to secure the greatest por- tion of the ocean carrying trade, while we have no system whatever. Sngland is now beating hb with oar own weapons. The Canadian jPacific Railroad will soon be in complete operation, and Canada has paid this tribute to England, not perhaps with the idea of diverting all the trade through the Dominion, but with the hope of obtaining a large share of it. Canada offers to pay $75,000 a year to a line of steamers between V ancouver'